Perancangan Sistem Informasi Tender Bokar Menggunakan Metode Design Thinking


Authors

  • Letty Latifani Arifah Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Allsela Meiriza Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Pacu Putra Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Nabila Rizky Oktadini Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Putri Eka Sevtiyuni Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v3i6.798

Keywords:

Rubber; Tender; Information System; Design Thinking; Prototype

Abstract

The government has been established improving the quality of rubber by implementing the Gerakan Nasional Bokar Bersih directed through Unit Pengolahan dan Pemasaran Bokar or UPPB. In processing and marketing rubber, UPPB conducts a rubber tender system. One of the UPPBs that applies the rubber tender system is UPPB KT. Karya Tani-IV. However, the tender system is still carried out conventionally through the Whatsapp group, so that the marketing of rubber carried out is still less extensive and is only marketed to known tender participants. In addition, UPPB KT. Karya Tani-IV currently does not have a website-based information system that can store farmer rubber recording data using a database. Therefore, this research provides a solution to design a prototype of the rubber tender Information System using the Design Thinking method. The design thinking method is considered capable of overcoming the problems faced by creating solutions based on user needs. The Design Thinking method is used to solve problems through creative ways by involving users into thinking activities and the user's point of view is used as the main benchmark in an action or activity in solving problems. The prototype of this system is designed to expand the reach of rubber marketing and make it easier for UPPB KT. Karya Tani-IV in processing rubber data. After testing the prototype using the System Usability Scale method, a final score of 82.45 was obtained. The final score obtained is included in the Acceptability Ranges category of "Acceptable" with a grade scale of "A" and receives an adjective rating of "Excellent", so the prototype designed is acceptable and feasible to be developed as a system that can assist the marketing and processing of Bokar data at UPPB KT. Karya Tani-IV.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan, “Statistik Perkebunan Non Unggulan Nasional 2020-2022,” Jakarta, 2020.

A. J. Alamsyah, I. S. Nugraha, D. S. Agustina, and A. Vachlepi, “Tinjauan Penerapan Unit Pengolahan Dan Pemasaran Bokar Untuk Mendukung Gerakan Nasional Bokar Bersih Di Sumatera Selatan,” War. Perkaretan, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 159–172, 2017, doi: 10.22302/ppk.wp.v36i2.307.

I. S. Nugraha, A. Alamsyah, and D. S. Agustina, “Peningkatan Bagian Harga Yang Diterima Petani Melalui Pemasaran Terorganisir,” War. Perkaretan, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35–46, 2019.

A. Mursyidah, I. Aknuranda, and H. Muslimah Az-Zahra, “Perancangan Antarmuka Pengguna Sistem Informasi Prosedur Pelayanan Umum Menggunakan Metode Design Thinking (Studi Kasus: Fakultas Ilmu Komputer Universitas Brawijaya),” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 3931–3938, 2019.

D. Kelley and T. Brown, “An introduction to Design Thinking,” Inst. Des. Stanford, 2018, doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000142.

D. R. Indah, M. A. Firdaus, M. F. E. Pratama, and D. M. Saputra, “Perancangan UI/UX Pada Prototype Knowledge Management System Pembelajaran Sma Menggunakan Metode Design Thinking,” JSI J. Sist. Inf. (E Journal), vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 2920–2933, 2022.

A. Andri and S. Suyanto, “Pengembangan Aplikasi Lelang Karet Berbasis Mobile Sebagai Pendukung Akses Informasi Lelang,” Edumatic J. Pendidik. Inform., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 85–94, 2020.

F. Fajriyah, A. Josi, and T. Fisika, “Rancang Bangun Sistem Informasi Tender Karet Desa Jungai Menggunakan Metode Waterfall,” J. Sisfokom (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 111–115, 2017, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v6i2.256.

R. Destriani and R. I. Heroza, “Penerapan Design Thinking Dengan Pendekatan Konsep Gamifikasi Guna Meningkatkan Motivasi Konsumsi Buah Dan Sayur Pada Anak,” J. Tekno Kompak, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 81–95, 2023.

M. A. D. Pratama, Y. R. Ramadhan, and T. I. Hermanto, “Rancangan UI/UX Design Aplikasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Jepang Pada Sekolah Menengah Atas Menggunakan Metode Design Thinking,” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 980–987, 2022.

L. Lutfi and I. Sukoco, “Design Thinking David Kelley & Tim Brown: Otak Dibalik Penciptaan Aplikasi Gojek,” Organum J. Saintifik Manaj. dan Akunt., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2019.

R. F. Dam and Y. S. Teo, “What is Design Thinking and Why Is It So Popular?,” Interact. Des. Found., pp. 1–6, 2018.

R. Wolniak, “Design Thinking Method and Its Stages,” Syst. Wspomagania W In?ynierii Prod., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 247–255, 2017.

G. H. Steinke, S. Al-Deen, and R. C. Labrie, “Innovating Information System Development Methodologies with Design Thinking,” Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Appl. Innov. IT, no. March, pp. 51–55, 2017.

M. Pande and S. V. Bharathi, “Theoretical foundations of design thinking – A constructivism learning approach to design thinking,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 36, pp. 1–17, 2020.

R. F. Dam, “The 5 Stages in the Design Thinking Process,” Interaction Design Foundation, 2022. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process (accessed Feb. 10, 2023).

M. Lewrick, P. Link, and L. Leifer, The Design Thinking Playbook: Mindful Digital Transformation of Teams. New Jersey, 2018.

I. Darmawan, M. S. Anwar, A. Rahmatulloh, and H. Sulastri, “Design Thinking Approach for User Interface Design and User Experience on Campus Academic Information Systems,” Int. J. Informatics Vis., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 327–334, 2022.

A. Revythi and N. Tselios, “Extension of technology acceptance model by using system usability scale to assess behavioral intention to use e-learning,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2341–2355, 2019.

D. Haryuda, M. Asfi, and R. Fahrudin, “Perancangan UI/UX Menggunakan Metode Design Thinking Berbasis Web Pada Laportea Company,” J. Ilm. Teknol. Inf. Terap., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 111–117, 2021.

K. Kaplan, “When to Empathy Map: 3 Options,” Nielsen Norman Group, 2023. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/using-empathy-maps/ (accessed May 13, 2023).

R. F. Dam and T. Y. Siang, “How to Select the Best Idea by the End of an Ideation Session,” Interaction Design Foundation, 2022. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/how-to-select-the-best-idea-by-the-end-of-an-ideation-session (accessed May 13, 2023).

E. Ramadhani and A. Sidiq, “Design Thinking Method to Develop a Digital Evidence Handling Management Application,” Khazanah Inform. J. Ilmu Komput. dan Infromatika, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 34–41, 2022.

J. Sauro, “5 Ways to Interpret a SUS Score,” MeasuringU, 2018. https://measuringu.com/interpret-sus-score/ (accessed Apr. 19, 2023).


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Perancangan Sistem Informasi Tender Bokar Menggunakan Metode Design Thinking

Dimensions Badge

ARTICLE HISTORY


Published: 2023-06-24
Abstract View: 730 times
PDF Download: 728 times

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)