Penerapan Metode MOORA dan MOOSRA dalam Penentuan Kelayakan Nasabah Penerima Kredit


Authors

  • Mawan Br Hutahaean Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia
  • Rima Tamara Aldisa Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Sardima Siregar Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia
  • Arina Mana Sikana Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia
  • Mesran Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v4i3.1434

Keywords:

DSS; MOORA Method; MOOSRA Method; Credit

Abstract

This study aims to determine the eligibility of customers receiving credit. The credit system is needed among the general public. For example for people who want to buy an item but are constrained by costs. So the existence of this credit system is very helpful to the community. However, in the process of granting credit to customers, many problems were found, including problems with customers who later defaulted on credit payments (loans that were not repaid). Therefore Based on this problem, we need a decision support system that helps identify the wrong recipient. The method used in this study is the MOORA method and the MOOSRA method, which is a method for determining priorities for credit recipients, which later by processing the MOORA and MOOSRA methods can help solve problems that occur. A decision support system is a computer-based system composed of interacting components: a language system component, a knowledge system component, and a problem solving system component, and uses data and decision-making models to create a semi-structured It solves structured problems and semi-structured problems and help in decision making. Based on the research that has been done by testing the MOORA and MOOSRA methods, the highest ranking results are those who are entitled to receive credit, namely Alternative 2 named Mujiani with a result of 0.4591 using the MOORA method and similarly using the MOOSRA method, which is the highest ranking also obtained by alternative 2 with a result of 33.2729

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Kaban, A. H. Nasyuha, and M. Syaifuddin, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Penentuan Kelayakan Pemberian Pinjaman Pada Nasabah PNM Mekaar Cabang Delitua Dengan Menggunakan Metode Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (WASPAS),” J. Cyber Tech, vol. 2, no. 5, 2022.

A. Wahyuni, Y. T. Widayati, and E. R. Sulistyawati, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN MENENTUKAN KELAYAKAN NASABAH KREDIT USAHA RAKYAT (KUR) MENGGUNAKAN METODE MOORA,” KOMPUTAKI, vol. 6, no. 1, 2020.

M. R. DWITA, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Penentuan Kelayakan Pemberian Pinjaman Pada Nasabah PNM Mekaar Cabang Delitua Dengan Menggunakan Metode Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (WASPAS),” J. Cendikia Teknol. Mulia, vol. 1, no. 1, 2021.

Kusrini, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dan Aplikasinya. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2007.

S. Syamsudin and R. Rahim, “Study Approach Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS),” Int. J. Recent Trends Eng. Res., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 268–285, 2017.

B. J. Hutapea, M. A. Hasmi, and A. Karim, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Jenis Kulit Terbaik Untuk Pembuatan Sepatu Dengan Menggunakan Metode VIKOR,” J. Ris. Komput., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 6–12, 2018.

K. Umam, V. E. Sulastri, T. Andiri, D. U. Sutiksno, and Mesran, “Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Prioritas Produk Unggulan Daerah Menggunakan Metode VIKOR,” J. Ris. Komput., vol. Vol 5, no. 1, pp. 43–49, 2018.

P. Fitriani and T. S. Alasi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Menentukan Judul Skripsi Mahasiswa dengan Metode WASPAS , COPRAS dan EDAS berdasarkan Penilaian Dosen,” vol. 4, pp. 1051–1061, 2020.

E. D. S. Mulyani, “Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode SAW Dengan WP Dalam Pemberian Pinjaman,” Cogito Smart J., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 239–251, 2019.

R. Y. Simanullang, Melisa, and Mesran, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Covid-19 Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” TIN Terap. Inform. Nusant., vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 2–9, 2021.

T. Limbong et al., Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Metode & Implementasi. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020.

D. Nofriansyah, Konsep Data Mining Vs Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. 2015.

D. Nofriansyah and S. Defit, Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. 2018.

L. D. Jayanti, “Implementasi Metode Weighted Product Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Kredit Pada BPR BKK KARANGANYAR Kab. Pekalongan,” J. Tek. Inform. Univ. Dian Nuswantoro, 2014.

M. Ickhsan, D. Anggraini, R. Haryono, S. H. Sahir, and Rohminatin, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Kredit Usaha Rakyat Menggunakan Metode Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (WASPAS),” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 9–10, 2018.

P. Issn and L. M. F. Israwan, “PENERAPAN MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION ON THE BASIS OF RATIO ( MOORA ) DALAM PENENTUAN ASISTEN LABORATORIUM,” vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 19–23, 2019.

N. W. Al-Hafiz, Mesran, and Suginam, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentukan Kredit Pemilikan Rumah Menerapkan Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis ( Moora ),” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. I, no. 1, pp. 306–309, 2017.

N. K. Daulay, B. Intan, and M. Irvai, “Comparison of the WASPAS and MOORA Methods in Providing Single Tuition Scholarships,” IJICS (International J. Informatics Comput. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 84–94, 2021.

A. T. Hidayat, N. K. Daulay, and Mesran, “Penerapan Metode Multi-Objective Optimization on The Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) dalam Pemilihan Wiraniaga Terbaik,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 367–372, 2020.

M. Mesran, S. D. A. Pardede, A. Harahap, and A. P. U. Siahaan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Peserta Jaminan Kesehatan Masyarakat (Jamkesmas) Menerapkan Metode MOORA,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 16–22, 2018.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Penerapan Metode MOORA dan MOOSRA dalam Penentuan Kelayakan Nasabah Penerima Kredit

Dimensions Badge

ARTICLE HISTORY


Published: 2023-12-25
Abstract View: 167 times
PDF Download: 259 times

Most read articles by the same author(s)