Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Penentuan Jurusan dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dan Pembobotan ROC


Authors

  • Jhiro Faran Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Rima Tamara Aldisa Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v4i3.1541

Keywords:

Decision Support System; ROC Method; SAW Method; Determining Major

Abstract

When someone chooses a major, they will focus on a particular area of study throughout their learning period. Usually, each department has a curriculum that has been specially prepared to provide in-depth understanding, specific skills and knowledge in that discipline. Decisions in choosing a major are often based on personal interests, talents, environmental influences, including parental views and personal career goals. Some courses may have specific entry requirements or may involve developing specific skills over the course of your studies. Apart from that, choosing a major can also influence the direction and career you will follow after graduating. Therefore, it is very important to make careful decisions and obtain the views of educational advisors or career counselors according to personal educational and career goals. This research discusses studies at a high school, where there are only two major choices, namely science and social studies. In the process of selecting majors, schools use special selection methods other than the general test route. The problem that arises is the need for flexibility and accuracy in decision making. To overcome this problem, researchers used a decision support system method by combining the ROC and SAW methods. ROC is used to calculate criteria weights, while SAW is used to assess preferences. The results of applying these two methods show that the initial major choices made by students are often different from the majors determined using these two methods. A total of five students were assigned to major in science, including alternatives A2, A3, A7, A8 and A10, while five other students were assigned to major in social sciences, namely alternatives A1, A4, A5, A6 and A9.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sarwandi et al., Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, 1st ed. Medan: CV Graha Mitra Edukasi, 2023.

F. Angela, R. Seran, Y. P. K. Kelen, and D. Nababan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Jurusan Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product,” vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 147–159, 2013.

K. Mahasiswa and D. Metode, “Perancangan spk tentang keterampilan mahasiswa dengan metode saw 1) 1),” vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 105–112, 2023.

M. A. Abdullah et al., “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Pemilihan Perawat Terbaik Menerapkan Metode SAW dengan Pembobotan ROC,” vol. 4, no. 3, 2023.

N. Rahma, Y. Amrozi, and N. D. F. Salsabila, “Telaah Kajian Pustaka Pemodelan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pada Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah,” J. Simantec, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 185–190, 2023.

B. Andika, A. F. Boy, S. Saniman, and G. K. Sitepu, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Bibit Kelapa Sawit Menggunakan Metode MOORA,” J. Teknol. Sist. Inf. dan Sist. Komput. TGD, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 668–677, 2023.

F. Siringoringo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Penerima Bantuan Sosial Menggunakan Metode Electre & Roc,” Manag. Inf. Syst. J., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 85–95, 2023.

A. Triayudi et al., “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Aplikasi Chat Terbaik Menggunakan Metode OCRA Dengan Pembobotan ROC,” vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 891–898, 2023.

Y. A. Singgalen, “Analisis Sentimen dan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menginap di Hotel Menggunakan Metode CRISP-DM dan SAW,” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 4, no. 4, 2023.

S. Suryani, E. S. Marsiani, and E. K. A. R. Pinahayu, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Jurusan Siswa Baru Pada SMK Manunggal Menggunakan Metode SAW,” JRKT (Jurnal Rekayasa Komputasi Ter., vol. 3, no. 03, pp. 136–142, 2023.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Penentuan Jurusan dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dan Pembobotan ROC

Dimensions Badge

ARTICLE HISTORY


Published: 2023-12-25
Abstract View: 276 times
PDF Download: 279 times

Most read articles by the same author(s)