Combination of Weighted Product Method and Entropy Weighting in the Best Warehouse Employee Recommendation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v5i1.2095Keywords:
Best Employees; Entropy; Combination; Warehouse; Weighting ProductAbstract
The best warehouse employees are individuals who show exceptional dedication and precision in carrying out their duties. Not only do they ensure that every process, from receipt to delivery, is carried out with high accuracy, but they are also proactive in finding ways to improve operational efficiency. The main problem lies in the proper assessment of employees' technical skills and soft skills, such as rigor, time management ability, and teamwork. Additionally, the selection process can be complicated when it comes to balancing previous work experience and adaptability to new technologies. Without effective assessment methods, the risk of selecting the wrong employee can negatively impact the overall productivity and operational efficiency of the warehouse. The purpose of the study, which combines entropy weighting method with the WP method is an approach that can increase objectivity and accuracy in multi-criteria decision-making. In this combination, the Entropy method is used first to objectively determine the weight of the criteria based on the degree of variation or information contained in the data of each criterion. The weights generated by the Entropy method reflect the importance of criteria based on how much information is provided, assuming that criteria with more variety have more information. Once the weights are determined, the Weighted Product method is used to evaluate and rank alternatives. Based on the results of the recommendation for the selection of the best warehouse employee Hadi occupies the top position in the selection of the best warehouse employee with a score of 0.07194. His position was followed by Putri who got a score of 0.07082, showing a performance that was also very good and only slightly below Hadi. Budi is ranked third with a score of 0.06621, while Deni is ranked fourth and Kiki is fifth with a score of 0.06544 and 0.06524, respectively. The score obtained by each employee shows a relatively small difference, reflecting the fierce competition and high quality of performance among the employees
Downloads
References
R. Kumar, A. Bhattacherjee, A. D. Singh, S. Singh, and C. I. Pruncu, “Selection of portable hard disk drive based upon weighted aggregated sum product assessment method: A case of Indian market,” Meas. Control, vol. 53, no. 7–8, pp. 1218–1230, 2020.
A. R. Mishra, P. Rani, and R. S. Prajapati, “Multi-criteria weighted aggregated sum product assessment method for sustainable biomass crop selection problem using single-valued neutrosophic sets,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 113, p. 108038, 2021.
S. Fernandez, C. Prihantoro, and A. K. Hidayah, “Implementasi Weighted Product Pada Pemilihan Dosen Terbaik di Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu,” Pseudocode, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 126–133, 2021.
R. Yuni Simanullang and I. Susilawati, “Seleksi Penerimaan Sales Marketing Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Metode Weighted Product Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan,” JIKTEKS J. Ilmu Komput. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 1, no. 3 SE-Ilmu Komputer, pp. 1–7, Aug. 2023, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.faatuatua.com/index.php/JIKTEKS/article/view/12
P. Hasan and Heru Sutejo, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN SELEKSI PELANGGAN TERBAIK INDIHOME CUSTOMER GATHERING MENGGUNAKAN METODE WP (STUDI KASUS: PT. TELKOM WITEL PAPUA),” Tek. Teknol. Inf. dan Multimed., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 34–40, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.46764/teknimedia.v5i1.185.
T. S. Diri, E. Fatkhiyah, and R. Y. Ariyana, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Objek Wisata Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product (Studi Kasus: Objek Wisata Pantai Pulau Adonara Kabupaten Flores Timur),” J. Scr., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 32–39, 2022.
T. Van Dua, D. Van Duc, N. C. Bao, and D. D. Trung, “Integration of objective weighting methods for criteria and MCDM methods: application in material selection,” EUREKA Phys. Eng., no. 2, pp. 131–148, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.21303/2461-4262.2024.003171.
I. Mukhametzyanov, “Specific character of objective methods for determining weights of criteria in MCDM problems: Entropy, CRITIC and SD,” Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 76–105, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.31181/dmame210402076i.
A. D. Wahyudi, S. Sumanto, S. Setiawansyah, and A. Yudhistira, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Hotel Bintang Tiga Menggunakan Kombinasi Entropy dan Combine Compromise Solution,” Bull. Artif. Intell., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 16–25, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.62866/buai.v3i1.142.
T. Singh, “Entropy weighted WASPAS and MACBETH approaches for optimizing the performance of solar water heating system,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., vol. 53, p. 103922, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2023.103922.
G. M. Magableh, “An integrated model for rice supplier selection strategies and a comparative analysis of fuzzy multicriteria decision-making approaches based on the fuzzy entropy weight method for evaluating rice suppliers,” PLoS One, vol. 19, no. 4, p. e0301930, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301930.
Y. Mao, H. Xie, X. Zhang, F. Hou, and M. Wang, “Study on the Applicable Room Size Dimension of Stratum Ventilation for Heating Based on Multi-Criteria Analytic Hierarchy Process-Entropy Weight Model,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 381, 2023.
M. A. Abdullah and R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapan Metode MAUT Dalam Rekrutmen Kepala Gudang di Perusahaan Dengan Pembobotan ROC,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1073–1079, 2023.
R. Hermawan, M. T. Habibie, D. Sutrisno, A. S. Putra, and N. Aisyah, “Decision Support System For The Best Employee Selection Recommendation Using Ahp (Analytic Hierarchy Process) Method,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1218–1226, 2021.
M. Mesran, E. P. Sumantri, S. Supriyanto, S. H. Sahir, and N. K. Daulay, “Implementation of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) in Recommendations for New Position in Companies,” IJISTECH (International J. Inf. Syst. Technol., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 661–669, 2021.
F. S. Mawinar, R. D. Gunawan, and A. T. Priandika, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pegawai Honorer Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Visekriterijumsko Kompromisno Rangiranje,” J. Data Sci. Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 182–191, 2023.
F. A. Ihsan, M. A. Z. Persadanta, R. Maulana, and A. Afrisawati, “IMPLEMENTASI METODE SMART UNTUK PEMILIHAN PEGAWAI BERPRESTASI PADA PUSKESMAS SEI DADAP,” JUTSI J. Teknol. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 101–110, 2024.
H. Sulistiani, Setiawansyah, P. Palupiningsih, F. Hamidy, P. L. Sari, and Y. Khairunnisa, “Employee Performance Evaluation Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) with PIPRECIA-S Weighting: A Case Study in Education Institution,” in 2023 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Informations System (ICIMCIS), 2023, pp. 369–373. doi: 10.1109/ICIMCIS60089.2023.10349017.
Setiawansyah, A. A. Aldino, P. Palupiningsih, G. F. Laxmi, E. D. Mega, and I. Septiana, “Determining Best Graduates Using TOPSIS with Surrogate Weighting Procedures Approach,” in 2023 International Conference on Networking, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology (IConNECT), 2023, pp. 60–64. doi: 10.1109/IConNECT56593.2023.10327119.
R. R. Purba, M. Mesran, M. T. A. Zaen, S. Setiawansyah, D. Siregar, and E. W. Ambarsari, “Decision Support System in the Best Selection Coffee Shop with TOPSIS Method,” IJICS (International J. Informatics Comput. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 28–34, 2023.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Combination of Weighted Product Method and Entropy Weighting in the Best Warehouse Employee Recommendation
ARTICLE HISTORY
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Waqas Arshad, Dedi Darwis, Heni Sulistiani, Ryan Randy Suryono, Yuri Rahmanto, Dyah Ayu Megawaty, Setiawansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
