Pemilihan Kepala Lingkungan Terbaik di Kelurahan Menerapkan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS)


Authors

  • Siti Hummairoh Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia
  • Mesran Mesran Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia
  • Alwin Fau Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v3i3.628

Keywords:

ARAS; Head of Environment; Criteria; Application; DSS

Abstract

In the Sudirejo-I Subdistrict, an election for the best neighborhood head will be held every year, this is intended as a reward for the neighborhood head for his duties in his area and is expected to be a motivation for each neighborhood head. Generally, the selection of the best kepling is done by selecting several neighborhood heads based on several criteria determined by the kelurahan and the election results are approved by the lurah. So far, the kelurahan selects criteria that have been determined manually and is quite time-consuming, the results obtained are also less than optimal. Based on the problems described above, a Decision Support System (SPK) is needed that can help with the problem of selecting the best neighborhood head in the Sudirejo-I Village because in a decision support system an effective and optimal decision will be produced. Many methods can be used in decision support systems, one of which is the Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method. The ARAS method is a multi-criteria decision-making method based on the concept of ranking using a utility degree by comparing the overall index value of each alternative to the overall optimal alternative index value. In its implementation, the decision support system in selecting the best splitter in the Sudirejo-I Village by implementing the ARAS method is considered very effective because it is able to produce a ranking of the value of each attribute, so that the selection results are more systematic and objective

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. Samsiyatun, Y. Yunita, and A. Junaidi, “Pemilihan Kelurahan Terbaik Di Kecamatan Palmerah Dengan Menggunakan Metode Analitycal Hierarchi Process,” J. Inform., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 199–204, 2020.

L. Handayani, M. Syahrizal, and K. Tampubolon, “Pemilihan Kepling Teladan Menerapkan Metode Rank Order Centroid (Roc) Dan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (Aras) Di Kecamatan Medan Area,” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 532–538, 2019.

I. P. Pertiwi, F. Fedinandus, and A. D. Limantara, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” CAHAYAtech, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 182, 2019.

R. Taufiq and C. A. Saputra, “Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Guru Menggunakan Metode Saw Pada Sman 15 Tangerang,” J. Sisfokom (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 7, no. 1, p. 75, 2018.

D. Diana and I. Seprina, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Menentukan Penerima Bantuan Sosial Menerapkan Weighted Product Method (WPM),” J. Edukasi dan Penelit. Inform., vol. 5, no. 3, p. 370, 2019.

S. W. Sari and B. Purba, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Ketua Danru Terbaik Menggunakan Metode ARAS,” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Komput. Sains SAINTEKS 2019, pp. 291–300, 2019.

M. Mesran, J. Afriany, and S. H. Sahir, “Efektifitas Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Dalam Peningkatan Motivasi Kerja Menerapkan Metode Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dan Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS),” Pros. Semin. Nas. Ris. Inf. Sci., vol. 1, no. 0, pp. 813–821, Sep. 2019.

N. A. H. Lia Ciky Lumban Gaol, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN TEAM LEADER SHIFT TERBAIK DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE ARAS STUDI KASUS PT. ANUGRAH BUSANA INDAH Lia,” Inf. dan Teknol. Ilm., 2018.

N. A. H. Tetty Rosmaria Sitompul, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN SELEKSI TENAGA KERJA UNTUK SECURITY SERVICE MENGGUNAKAN METODE ARAS,” vol. 2, 2018.

T. Limbong et al., Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Metode & Implementasi. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020.

Efraim Turban and Jay E. Aronson, Decision Support System and Intelligent Systems. 2001.

J. Afriany, “Penerapan Metode ARAS Guna Mendukung Keputusan Produk Unggulan Daerah,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 441–447, 2019.

R. Addenan and W. Susanti, “Penerapan Metode Rank Order Centroid dan Additive Ratio Assessment Pada Aplikasi Rekomendasi Supplier,” Edumatic J. Pendidik. Inform., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2021.

S. Dharma Hardi et al., “Implementation of Computer Based Systems for Effective Deci-sions in Acceptance of Vikar,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 101–104, 2018.

M. A. Hasmi, M. Mesran, and B. Nadeak, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Instruktur Fitness Menerapkan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (Aras) (Studi Kasus?: Vizta Gym Medan),” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 121–129, 2018.

Nindian Puspa Dewi, Ubaidi, and Elsi Maharani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Sales Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dan Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) Berbasis Web,” Digit. Zo. J. Teknol. Inf. dan Komun., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 172–183, 2021.

Dahriansah, A. Nata, and I. R. Harahap, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Siswa Berprestasi Pada Aliyah Aras Kabu Agung Tanjungbalai Menggunakan Metode AHP,” J-SISKO TECH J. Teknol. Sist. Inf. dan Sist. Komput. TGD, vol. 3, no. 1, 2020.

L. C. L. Gaol and N. A. Hasibuan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Team Leader Shift Terbaik Dengan Menggunakan Metode Aras Studi Kasus Pt. Anugrah Busana Indah,” Inf. dan Teknol. Ilm., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 101–106, 2018.

A. S. Nadeak, “Penerapan Metode Aras ( Additive Ratio Assessment ) Dalam Penilaian Guru Terbaik,” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Komput. Sains, vol. 2, no. 2010, pp. 571–578, 2019.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Pemilihan Kepala Lingkungan Terbaik di Kelurahan Menerapkan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS)

Dimensions Badge

ARTICLE HISTORY


Published: 2022-12-30
Abstract View: 236 times
PDF Download: 630 times