Comparative Analysis of Neural Network Architectures for Mental Health Diagnosis: A Deep Learning Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v4i4.1703Keywords:
Mental Health; Machine Learning; Comparison; Deep Learning; Neural NetworkAbstract
Mental health conditions present a complex diagnostic challenge due to the subtlety and diversity of symptoms. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of various neural network architectures, including Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTM), and Dense Neural Network (DNN), in their ability to classify mental health conditions. Utilizing a rich dataset of symptoms and expert diagnoses, we preprocessed the data to address class imbalances and trained each model to evaluate its diagnostic performance. Our results are presented through confusion matrices that reveal the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-scores for each model. The MLP and DNN models demonstrated high accuracy in identifying distinct conditions but struggled with overlapping symptoms. LSTM and RNN models captured temporal patterns to some extent yet required further optimization for improved accuracy. CNN models showed robust feature detection capabilities, with the CNN 1D model excelling in specificity for certain conditions. However, a common challenge across all models was the differentiation between conditions with similar symptom presentations. Our findings suggest that while individual models have their strengths, an ensemble approach may be necessary for enhanced diagnostic precision. Future work will focus on integrating models, refining feature extraction, and employing explainable AI to increase transparency and trust in model predictions. Additionally, expanding the dataset and conducting clinical trials will ensure the models' effectiveness in real-world settings. This research moves us closer to achieving nuanced, AI-driven diagnostics that can support clinicians and benefit patient outcomes in mental healthcare.
Downloads
References
W. H. Organization, “The World Health Report 2001: Mental health: new understanding, new hope,” 2001.
S. Bajaj et al., “South Asian women with diabetes: psychosocial challenges and management: consensus statement,” Indian J. Endocrinol. Metab., vol. 17, no. 4, p. 548, 2013.
S. Benatar and G. Brock, Global health: ethical challenges. Cambridge University Press, 2021.
W. H. Organization and others, “World mental health report: transforming mental health for all,” 2022.
D. Lee, Y. Kim, and B. Devine, “Spillover effects of mental health disorders on family members’ health-related quality of life: Evidence from a US sample,” Med. Decis. Mak., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 80–93, 2022.
Y. Shemesh and A. Chen, “A paradigm shift in translational psychiatry through rodent neuroethology,” Mol. Psychiatry, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 993–1003, 2023.
D. Taliaz and D. Souery, “A new characterization of mental health disorders using digital behavioral data: Evidence from major depressive disorder,” J. Clin. Med., vol. 10, no. 14, p. 3109, 2021.
J. J. Newson, D. Hunter, and T. C. Thiagarajan, “The heterogeneity of mental health assessment,” Front. psychiatry, vol. 11, p. 76, 2020.
T. Richter, B. Fishbain, G. Richter-Levin, and H. Okon-Singer, “Machine learning-based behavioral diagnostic tools for depression: advances, challenges, and future directions,” J. Pers. Med., vol. 11, no. 10, p. 957, 2021.
B. J. Coombes et al., “Dissecting clinical heterogeneity of bipolar disorder using multiple polygenic risk scores,” Transl. Psychiatry, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 314, 2020.
H. Li, R. Zhang, Y.-C. Lee, R. E. Kraut, and D. C. Mohr, “Systematic review and meta-analysis of AI-based conversational agents for promoting mental health and well-being,” NPJ Digit. Med., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 236, 2023.
R. S. McIntyre et al., “The clinical characterization of the adult patient with bipolar disorder aimed at personalization of management,” World Psychiatry, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 364–387, 2022.
S. Vatansever et al., “Artificial intelligence and machine learning-aided drug discovery in central nervous system diseases: State-of-the-arts and future directions,” Med. Res. Rev., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 1427–1473, 2021.
C. Sarkar et al., “Artificial intelligence and machine learning technology driven modern drug discovery and development,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 24, no. 3, p. 2026, 2023.
N. Chafai, L. Bonizzi, S. Botti, and B. Badaoui, “Emerging applications of machine learning in genomic medicine and healthcare,” Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci., pp. 1–24, 2023.
K. Swanson, E. Wu, A. Zhang, A. A. Alizadeh, and J. Zou, “From patterns to patients: Advances in clinical machine learning for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment,” Cell, 2023.
E. Lin, C.-H. Lin, and H.-Y. Lane, “Deep learning with neuroimaging and genomics in Alzheimer’s disease,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 22, no. 15, p. 7911, 2021.
C. Su, Z. Xu, J. Pathak, and F. Wang, “Deep learning in mental health outcome research: a scoping review,” Transl. Psychiatry, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 116, 2020.
C. Gupta et al., “Bringing machine learning to research on intellectual and developmental disabilities: Taking inspiration from neurological diseases,” J. Neurodev. Disord., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 28, 2022.
A. M. Antoniadi et al., “Current challenges and future opportunities for XAI in machine learning-based clinical decision support systems: a systematic review,” Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 11, p. 5088, 2021.
G. B. D. 2019 M. D. Collaborators and others, “Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990--2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019,” The Lancet Psychiatry, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 137–150, 2022.
J. Sun et al., “Artificial intelligence in psychiatry research, diagnosis, and therapy,” Asian J. Psychiatr., p. 103705, 2023.
A. Saka et al., “GPT models in construction industry: Opportunities, limitations, and a use case validation,” Dev. Built Environ., p. 100300, 2023.
S. Morande, “Enhancing psychosomatic health using artificial intelligence-based treatment protocol: A data science-driven approach,” Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 100124, 2022.
A. Abrol et al., “Deep learning encodes robust discriminative neuroimaging representations to outperform standard machine learning,” Nat. Commun., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 353, 2021.
A. Grzenda, “Artificial intelligence in mental health,” Converg. Ment. Heal. A Transdiscipl. Approach to Innov., p. 137, 2021.
T. Talaei Khoei, H. Ould Slimane, and N. Kaabouch, “Deep learning: Systematic review, models, challenges, and research directions,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 35, no. 31, pp. 23103–23124, 2023.
Y. Shao, “Imbalance Learning and Its Application on Medical Datasets,” Dissertation, Göttingen, Georg-August Universität, 2021, 2021.
Programmerrdai, “Mental Disorder Classification.” 2021.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Comparative Analysis of Neural Network Architectures for Mental Health Diagnosis: A Deep Learning Approach
ARTICLE HISTORY
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Gregorius Airlangga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
