Analisis Perbandingan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dan Weighted Product (WP) dengan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dalam Pemilihan Mahasiswa Terbaik


Authors

  • Denissa A. Putri Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Amelia H Ikhlas Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Agus Iskandar Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v4i3.1449

Keywords:

Students; ROC Method; WP Method; SAW Method; Decision Support System

Abstract

Students are the main element of a college. So that the assessment of the quality of a tertiary institution can be seen from the achievement and quality weight scores of each student studying at that tertiary institution. The university's awareness of this reality ultimately gave rise to the university's intention to increase student learning motivation. There are many ways in which universities can increase student motivation to become intellectual and qualified individuals. One way to motivate students is by giving awards to outstanding students. The problem is that there are so many students in higher education that it will be difficult to choose students of quality. To solve this problem, SPK is needed. SPK functions to help parties who are having difficulty making a decision. SPK requires a method. The methods used in this research are the SAW and WP methods with ROC weighting. The results obtained in this research are the first method SAW with a value of 0.9847 as the best alternative with code A7 in the name of Sapadi Sinebang. Compared with the WP method with a result of 0.1826 as the alternative with the highest value in the name of Sapadi Sinebang as the best alternative

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

P. Fitriani and T. S. Alasi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dengan Metode WASPAS, COPRAS, dan EDAS?: Menentukan Judul Skripsi,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 4, p. 56, 2020, doi: 10.30865/mib.v4i4.2431.

Y. S. Siregar and D. Handoko, “Analisa Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Metode MOORA dan ELECTRE dalam Penerima Beasiswa PPA,” Blend Sains J. Tek., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 114–126, 2022, doi: 10.56211/blendsains.v1i2.135.

Y. E. Chintyari and T. Prihatin, “Implementasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting Untuk Pemilihan Guru Berprestasi Pada SMP Islam Pondok Duta,” Jitk, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 133–138, 2018.

C. F. Sianturi, L. T. Sianturi, U. Hasanah, Khairunnisa, and Mesran, “Decision Support System for Accepting Pre-Employment Cards during the Covid-19 Pandemic Using the Method Multi Objective Optimization on The Basic of Ratio Analysis (MOORA),” IJICS (International J. Informatics Comput. Sci., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 217–223, 2021, doi: 10.30865/ijics.v5i2.3218.

M. R. Ramadhan, M. K. Nizam, and ..., “Penerapan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) Dalam Pemilihan Siswa-Siswi Berprestasi Pada Sekolah SMK Swasta Mustafa,” TIN Terap. Inform. …, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 459–471, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://ejurnal.seminar-id.com/index.php/tin/article/view/655.

R. S. P. Melisa Elistri, Jusuf Wahyudi, “Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making. Yogyakarta. Graha Ilmu.,” J. Media Infotama Penerapan Metod. SAW… ISSN, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 361, 2014.

R. Helilintar, W. W. Winarno, and H. Al Fatta, “Penerapan Metode SAW dan Fuzzy Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Beasiswa,” Creat. Inf. Technol. J., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 89, 2016, doi: 10.24076/citec.2016v3i2.68.

S. Nurlela, A. Akmaludin, S. Handianti, and L. Yusuf, “Penyeleksi Jurusan Terfavorit Pada SMK Sirajul Falah dengan Metode SAW,” 2021.

R. Yudiati and A. Annisa, “PELATIHAN PENINGKATAN INTERPERSONAL DAN INTRA PERSONAL SKILL CALON DUTA KAMPUS MAHASISWA FKIP UNIVERSITAS WIRARAJA,” J. Pengabdi. Mandiri, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 791–796, 2023.

N. N. U. R. SHOLEHAH, A. PRIHANTARA, and L. P. WANTI, “TUGAS AKHIR: SISTEM INFORMASI SELEKSI DUTA KAMPUS (STUDI KASUS: POLITEKNIK NEGERI CILACAP).” Politeknik Negeri Cilacap, 2022.

S. Khoiriyah, Y. Yunita, and A. Junaidi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Crew Store Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Profile Matching di PT Sumber Alfaria Trijaya,” J. Teknol. dan Ilmu Komput. Prima, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 27, 2019, doi: 10.34012/jutikomp.v2i2.668.

N. Hijriana, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN SELEKSI BEASISWA TINGKAT,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 90–96, 2018.

P. P. Santika, I. P. S. Handika, K. K. Widiartha, M. D. W. Aristana, and W. Welda, “KOMPARASI METODE AHP–ROC DALAM PENENTUAN PRIORITAS ALTERNATIF TERBAIK,” J. Krisnadana, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 59–67, 2022.

T. Limbong et al., Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Metode & Implementasi. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020.

S. B. S. Pandi Barita Nauli Simangunsong, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Dosen Berprestasi. Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2019.

A. I. Lubis, P. Sihombing, and E. B. Nababan, “Comparison SAW and MOORA Methods with Attribute Weighting Using Rank Order Centroid in Decision Making,” Mecn. 2020 - Int. Conf. Mech. Electron. Comput. Ind. Technol., pp. 127–131, 2020, doi: 10.1109/MECnIT48290.2020.9166640.

J. S. Komputer, J. D. Rajagukguk, B. Purba, P. T. Informatika, and B. Darma, “Penerapan Kombinasi Metode ROC Dan MAUT Dalam Penentuan Calon Penerima Bantuan UKT Pada Universitas Budi Darma,” vol. 6, no. September, pp. 1193–1206, 2022.

M. A. Abdullah and R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapan Metode MOOSRA Dalam Penentuan Penerimaan Frontliner Menggunakan Pembobotan Metode ROC,” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 330–337, 2023.

R. Khalida, B. Bangun, M. Mesran, and N. Oktari, “Penerapan Metode ROC dan Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (WASPAS) dalam Penerimaan Asisten Perkebunan,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 937, 2021, doi: 10.30865/mib.v5i3.3092.

M. Mesran, J. Afriany, and S. H. Sahir, “Efektifitas Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Dalam Peningkatan Motivasi Kerja Menerapkan Metode Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dan Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS),” Pros. Semin. Nas. Ris. Inf. Sci., vol. 1, no. September, p. 813, 2019, doi: 10.30645/senaris.v1i0.88.

R. Ristiana and Y. Jumaryadi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Paket Wedding Organizer Menggunakan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting),” J. Sisfokom (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2021, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v10i1.946.

T. Panggabean and Y. F. Manalu, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting ( SAW ) dalam Pemberian Reward Bagi Pegawai Honorer Menggunakan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid,” vol. 5, pp. 1667–1673, 2021.

S. Susliansyah, R. R. Aria, and S. Susilowati, “Sistem Pemilihan Laptop Terbaik Dengan Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product (Wp),” Techno Nusa Mandiri, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 15–20, 2019.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Analisis Perbandingan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dan Weighted Product (WP) dengan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dalam Pemilihan Mahasiswa Terbaik

Dimensions Badge

ARTICLE HISTORY


Published: 2023-12-25
Abstract View: 480 times
PDF Download: 308 times

Most read articles by the same author(s)