Social Network Analysis and Sentiment Classification of Extended Reality Product Content
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v4i4.1712Keywords:
Extended Reality; SNA; Sentiment; Classification; ProductAbstract
This study explores Extended Reality (XR) products, specifically focusing on the Apple Vision Pro, to elucidate consumer perceptions and the underlying social dynamics of these innovative technologies. This research delves into Extended Reality (XR) products, specifically focusing on the Apple Vision Pro, aiming to understand consumer perceptions and social dynamics surrounding these innovative technologies. By leveraging sentiment analysis and Social Network Analysis (SNA) alongside CRISP-DM and SVM algorithms, this study provides a comprehensive insight into sentiment patterns, network structures, and influential factors within the XR community. A multi-faceted approach is adopted to achieve the research objectives. Sentiment analysis and SNA dissect sentiment patterns and uncover network structures within the XR community. The CRISP-DM framework guides the research process, ensuring systematic data analysis and interpretation. SVM algorithms classify sentiments, providing a robust analytical framework for understanding consumer sentiments towards XR products. The analysis yields significant insights into XR consumer perceptions and social dynamics. The calculated network metrics, including a density of 0.000124, absence of reciprocity, centralization value of 0.001331, and modularity value of 0.999000, shed light on crucial network dynamics within the XR community. Examining frequently used words reveals prevalent topics within the XR discourse, providing valuable context for understanding consumer sentiments. Furthermore, the evaluation of SVM algorithms demonstrates commendable performance metrics, with the SVM without SMOTE achieving an accuracy rate of 84.33%, precision of 84.67%, recall of 99.28%, and f_measure of 91.39%. In comparison, the SVM with SMOTE exhibits an accuracy of 81.82% and a precision of 97.58%. This research contributes valuable insights into the consumer landscape of XR products, mainly focusing on the Apple Vision Pro. By combining sentiment analysis, SNA, and established methodologies, the study offers a nuanced understanding of consumer perceptions and social dynamics within the XR community. These findings inform strategic decisions and contribute to advancements in XR technologies, offering valuable insights into the efficacy of sentiment analysis techniques in understanding consumer sentiments
Downloads
References
B. Green, “Splendour XR: Place, Experience and Liveness at a Virtual Music Festival,” Leis. Sci., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–18, 2023, doi: 10.1080/01490400.2023.2171519.
S. J. Ahn, J. Kim, and J. Kim, “The future of advertising research in virtual, augmented, and extended realities,” Int. J. Advert., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 162–170, 2023, doi: 10.1080/02650487.2022.2137316.
K. A. Mills and A. Brown, “Smart glasses for 3D multimodal composition,” Learn. Media Technol., no. May, pp. 1–22, 2023, doi: 10.1080/17439884.2023.2207142.
I. Garrett, “Mixed reality in threatened environments,” Int. J. Perform. Arts Digit. Media, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 247–263, 2023, doi: 10.1080/14794713.2023.2196895.
M. Brescia-Zapata, K. Krejtz, A. T. Duchowski, C. J. Hughes, and P. Orero, “Subtitles in VR 360° video. Results from an eye-tracking experiment,” Perspect. Stud. Transl. Theory Pract., 2023, doi: 10.1080/0907676X.2023.2268122.
C. Creed, M. Al-Kalbani, A. Theil, S. Sarcar, and I. Williams, “Inclusive Augmented and Virtual Reality: A Research Agenda,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–20, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2023.2247614.
P. Dang et al., “A real 3D scene rendering optimization method based on region of interest and viewing frustum prediction in virtual reality,” Int. J. Digit. Earth, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1081–1100, 2022, doi: 10.1080/17538947.2022.2080878.
J. Lu et al., “An innovative virtual reality training tool for the pre-hospital treatment of cranialmaxillofacial trauma,” Comput. Assist. Surg., vol. 28, no. 1, p., 2023, doi: 10.1080/24699322.2023.2189047.
D. Suhartanto, D. Dean, T. Semiawan, L. Kusdibyo, and A. Sobarna, “Cognizing tourist loyalty during covid-19 pandemic through virtual reality lens,” Tour. Recreat. Res., 2021, doi: 10.1080/02508281.2021.1974274.
R. Szekely, O. Mason, D. Frohlich, and E. Barley, “The use of virtual reality to reduce mental health stigma among healthcare and non-healthcare students: a systematic review,” Behav. Inf. Technol., pp. 1–18, 2023, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2023.2232049.
M. Kersting, J. Bondell, R. Steier, and M. Myers, “Virtual reality in astronomy education: reflecting on design principles through a dialogue between researchers and practitioners,” Int. J. Sci. Educ. Part B Commun. Public Engagem., pp. 1–20, 2023, doi: 10.1080/21548455.2023.2238871.
A. Rivera-Pinto, J. Kildal, and E. Lazkano, “Toward Programming a Collaborative Robot by Interacting with Its Digital Twin in a Mixed Reality Environment,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–13, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2023.2221599.
M. Dehghani, F. Acikgoz, A. Mashatan, and S. H. Lee, “A holistic analysis towards understanding consumer perceptions of virtual reality devices in the post-adoption phase,” Behav. Inf. Technol., vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1453–1471, 2022, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2021.1876767.
S. T. Yun, S. K. Olsen, K. C. Quigley, M. A. Cannady, and A. Hartry, “A Review of Augmented Reality for Informal Science Learning: Supporting Design of Intergenerational Group Learning,” Visit. Stud., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10645578.2022.2075205.
M. J. Maas and J. M. Hughes, “Virtual, augmented and mixed reality in K–12 education: a review of the literature,” Technol. Pedagog. Educ., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 231–249, 2020, doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2020.1737210.
C. Aguayo and C. Eames, “Using mixed reality (XR) immersive learning to enhance environmental education,” J. Environ. Educ., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 58–71, 2023, doi: 10.1080/00958964.2022.2152410.
E. Chang, Y. Lee, and B. Yoo, “A User Study on the Comparison of View Interfaces for VR-AR Communication in XR Remote Collaboration,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2023.2241294.
K. M. Stanney, A. Skinner, and C. Hughes, “Exercisable Learning-Theory and Evidence-Based Andragogy for Training Effectiveness using XR (ELEVATE-XR): Elevating the ROI of Immersive Technologies,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 2177–2198, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2023.2188529.
N. O’Dwyer, G. W. Young, and A. Smolic, “XR Ulysses: addressing the disappointment of cancelled site-specific re-enactments of Joycean literary cultural heritage on Bloomsday,” Int. J. Perform. Arts Digit. Media, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 29–47, 2022, doi: 10.1080/14794713.2022.2031801.
I. Brookwell, “‘Discomforting VR’: Listening, Feeling, Contacting Virtual Reality Community,” Vis. Resour., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 223–244, 2021, doi: 10.1080/01973762.2023.2238486.
B. Mesz, J. C. Sakdavong, S. Silén, and A. Hopia, “Aesthetic emotions in a mixed reality gastrosonic experience: an exploratory study,” Digit. Creat., pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: 10.1080/14626268.2023.2287189.
S. Ligthart, G. Meynen, N. Biller-Andorno, T. Kooijmans, and P. Kellmeyer, “Is Virtually Everything Possible? The Relevance of Ethics and Human Rights for Introducing Extended Reality in Forensic Psychiatry,” AJOB Neurosci., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 144–157, 2022, doi: 10.1080/21507740.2021.1898489.
M. Charitonidou, “Interactive art as reflective experience: Imagineers and ultra-technologists as interaction designers,” Vis. Resour., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 382–396, 2020, doi: 10.1080/01973762.2022.2041218.
J. E. Jeon, “The impact of XR applications’ user experience-based design innovativeness on loyalty,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 10, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2161761.
R. Villena-Taranilla, R. Cózar-Gutiérrez, J. A. González-Calero, and P. D. Diago, “An extended technology acceptance model on immersive virtual reality use with primary school students,” Technol. Pedagog. Educ., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 367–388, 2023, doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2023.2196281.
S. G. Fussell and D. Truong, “Accepting virtual reality for dynamic learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 5442–5459, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2021.2009880.
M. Rzeszewski and J. Naji, “Literary placemaking and narrative immersion in extended reality virtual geographic environments,” Int. J. Digit. Earth, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 853–867, 2022, doi: 10.1080/17538947.2022.2061619.
T. Harrison, “Virtual reality and character education: Learning opportunities and risks,” J. Moral Educ., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–21, 2023, doi: 10.1080/03057240.2023.2206553.
E. Dare, “Diffracting Virtual Realities: Towards an A-effected VR,” Perform. Res., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 101–106, 2020, doi: 10.1080/13528165.2020.1868851.
D. O’Shiel, “Disappearing boundaries? Reality, virtuality and the possibility of ‘pure’ mixed reality (MR),” Indo-Pacific J. Phenomenol., vol. 20, no. 1, p. e1887570, 2020, doi: 10.1080/20797222.2021.1887570.
V. Girishan Prabhu, L. Stanley, R. Morgan, and B. Shirley, “Designing and developing a nature-based virtual reality with heart rate variability biofeedback for surgical anxiety and pain management: evidence from total knee arthroplasty patients,” Aging Ment. Heal., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: 10.1080/13607863.2023.2270442.
M. Rauscher and A. Humpe, “Traveling the Past: Raising Awareness of Cultural Heritage through Virtual Reality,” J. Promot. Manag., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 128–143, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10496491.2021.1987958.
I. de V. Bosman, O. ‘Oz’ Buruk, K. Jørgensen, and J. Hamari, “The effect of audio on the experience in virtual reality: a scoping review,” Behav. Inf. Technol., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 165–199, 2024, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2022.2158371.
G. Sadanala, X. Xu, H. He, J. A. Bueno-Vesga, and S. Li, “‘Transition into relatable reality’: experience analysis in a 3D desktop virtual-reality-based new student online orientation,” J. Res. Technol. Educ., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–22, 2023, doi: 10.1080/15391523.2023.2210321.
N. C. Tai, “Applications of augmented reality and virtual reality on computer-assisted teaching for analytical sketching of architectural scene and construction,” J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1664–1681, 2023, doi: 10.1080/13467581.2022.2097241.
Y. A. Singgalen, “Culture and heritage tourism sentiment classification through cross-industry standard process for data mining,” Int. J. Basic Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 110–120, 2023.
Y. A. Singgalen, “Sentiment classification of coral reef 101 content using decision tree algorithm through CRISP-DM,” Int. J. Basic Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 121–130, 2023.
Y. A. Singgalen, “Comparative analysis of decision tree and support vector machine algorithm in sentiment classification for birds of paradise content,” Int. J. Basic Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 100–109, 2023.
V. W. D. Thomas and F. Rumaisa, “Analisis Sentimen Ulasan Hotel Bahasa Indonesia Menggunakan Support Vector Machine dan TF-IDF,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1767–1774, 2022, doi: 10.30865/mib.v6i3.4218.
W. Wijaya, D. E. Herwindiati, and N. J. Perdana, “Penerapan Metode Support Vector Machine Untuk Analisis Sentimen Pada Ulasan Pelanggan Hotel di Tripadvisor,” J. Ilmu Komput. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2022, doi: 10.24076/joism.2021v3i2.558.
Rousyati, W. Gata, D. Pratmanto, and N. K. Warchani, “Analisis Sentimen Financial Technology Peer to Peer Lending Pada Aplikasi Koinworks,” J. Teknol. Infor, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1167–1176, 2022, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.202294409.
J. Laine, T. Korhonen, and K. Hakkarainen, “Primary school students’ experiences of immersive virtual reality use in the classroom,” Cogent Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2196896.
R. Yung, C. Khoo-Lattimore, and L. E. Potter, “Virtual reality and tourism marketing: conceptualizing a framework on presence, emotion, and intention,” Curr. Issues Tour., vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1505–1525, 2021, doi: 10.1080/13683500.2020.1820454.
N. Zou, Q. Gong, Q. Chai, and C. Chai, “The role of virtual reality technology in conceptual design: positioning, applications, and value,” Digit. Creat., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 53–77, 2023, doi: 10.1080/14626268.2023.2166080.
T. S. Aleman et al., “A virtual reality orientation and mobility test for inherited retinal degenerations: Testing a proof-of-concept after gene therapy,” Clin. Ophthalmol., vol. 15, pp. 939–952, 2021, doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S292527.
J. R. Branstrator, C. T. Cavaliere, L. Xiong, and D. Knight, “Extended reality and sustainable tourism: restorying human–wildlife relationships for biocultural conservation,” J. Ecotourism, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 103–119, 2023, doi: 10.1080/14724049.2022.2055046.
R. Lavuri and U. Akram, “Role of virtual reality authentic experience on affective responses: moderating role virtual reality attachment,” J. Ecotourism, pp. 1–19, 2023, doi: 10.1080/14724049.2023.2237704.
J. Chen, N. Xi, V. Pohjonen, and J. Hamari, “Paying attention in metaverse: an experiment on spatial attention allocation in extended reality shopping,” Inf. Technol. People, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 255–283, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1108/ITP-09-2021-0674.
S. Alizadehsalehi and I. Yitmen, “Digital twin-based progress monitoring management model through reality capture to extended reality technologies (DRX),” Smart Sustain. Built Environ., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 200–236, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-01-2021-0016.
A. Devereaux, “The digital Wild West: on social entrepreneurship in extended reality,” J. Entrep. Public Policy, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 198–217, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1108/JEPP-03-2019-0018.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Social Network Analysis and Sentiment Classification of Extended Reality Product Content
ARTICLE HISTORY
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Yerik Afrianto Singgalen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
